Corruption: The Attorney General and Alhaji Fear God’s rhetoric
An enterprising herbalist called Alhaji Baba Fear God has built himself a spanking website at www.alhajibabafeargod.com and buys advert columns in newspapers to communicate messages about traditional medical services he says he has on offer. He also advertises his herbal concoctions on Alhaji Fear God Television, Facebook and YouTube. He offers therapy for a long list of what I presume to be psychological and medical problems, which he refers to in his adverts and on his website as “challenges.”
Advertisement
Unfortunately, the clarity of the messages relating to some of the “challenges” he offers to treat is obscured in strange and apparently unrelated words strung together: His prose is as linguistically outlandish and incomprehensible as it is bizarre and gibberish. For example, he offers to treat such “challenges” as “love me alone”, “promise and fail”, “duping or fake”, “market call” and “Come back to me”.
The puzzling thing about it all is that he is able to communicate clearly when it comes to other “challenges.” He offers therapy for “smoking habit”, “drinking habit”,” marital problems”, “bad luck”, “bad mouth odour”, “vaginal odour”, “stroke”, “menstrual problems”, “hypertension” and surprise, surprise, “staphylococcus” , the last one having probably been dropped in his lap by a medical laboratory technician friend.
His potential patients apparently fall under two categories, then: The general public and a segment of society which has its own secret dialect. I don’t know which of them are more of an irritant, those who never mean what they say or those who never say what they mean.
Financial accountability
Leave Alhaji Baba alone for a moment, and let us take a hard look at the watchmen over state coffers and the strange language in which they keep speaking to us about financial accountability or the absence of it in public institutions:
First, there is the Controller and Accountant General. He has established financial administration decrees, regulations and instructions for all public institutions to abide by.
Previous audit reports and even admissions by the Accountant General’s own office support the view that violations of these regulations and instructions have been endemic.
What we might ask is the sense in the Controller and Accountant-General establishing rules and regulations for public institutions and then relying solely on the goodwill of people in those institutions for compliance, instead of adopting appropriate methods of enforcement?
The results might be interesting if an independent team of experts undertake an exercise to determine if accounting personnel of government institutions have been preparing monthly expenditure and bank reconciliation statements on schedule.
Auditing
Next comes the Auditor General. The Auditor General is required by the Constitution to audit the whole of the public sector including the local government administrations, the courts, universities, public boards, corporations and all other public institutions operating or funded with public funds.
Over the past 30 years and longer, the Auditor General has maintained his ritualistic habit of announcing in his biannual report on public sector financial administration, that financial improprieties in the sector are endemic.
Then he typically goes on to report how public money has been “misapplied”, “embezzled” “misappropriated” or “diverted.” I usually wonder what the hell he is talking about. The man is usually talking about the plain theft of public cash, isn’t he?
Thank you so very much sir, Mr Auditor General, but where is the annual ritual getting us? Should auditing of the accounts of public institutions not be more frequent? What is the sense in allowing a thief to scoot with loot before sounding the alarm?
Public Accounts Committee
Then there is Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC). It is the duty of this committee to examine audited accounts showing the expenditure of funds granted by Parliament to meet the expenditure of the government, as presented to Parliament by the Auditor General for approval.
After examining the Auditor General’s report, the PAC is required to submit its recommendations for appropriate action to be taken on the Auditor-General’s reports.
Sittings of the PAC are usually given wide media coverage but then, guess what happens next? Nothing. How come nothing ever happens after the revelations of widespread financial improprieties in public? The institutions of public accountability only appear to be constantly taking us through stage-managed, ritualistic motions when it comes to sanctioning corrupt public officials.
The PAC says it is the responsibility of the Attorney General to prosecute government officials found to have stolen public money.
The committee has kept insisting that the law does not give it the powers to pursue the prosecution of the offending officials, and that the committee always expects the Attorney General to prosecute the offenders to serve as deterrent to other public officials.
In its 2014 report to Parliament which was only recently released, the Auditor General indicated that 43 assemblies had failed to account for over GH¢1 billion! What can’t that money do when it comes to the provision of critical infrastructure, social services and funding programmes of social intervention?
Reports have abounded with members of District, Municipal and Metropolitan Assemblies launching spirited protests against acts of corruption and inefficiency on the part of assembly chief executives. Whole towns and communities have gone on demonstrations against the chief executives for the same reasons.
Most of the complaints and criticisms against them have ranged from excessive or unauthorised spending of assembly funds through the award of questionable public contracts on behalf of assemblies to conflict of interest and inefficiency.
Some chief executives have been accused of superintending over the inflation of costs in the execution of contracts with the renovation of assembly buildings and chief executives’ bungalows being a common source of conflict between assembly members and chief executives.
Yet, it is rare to hear that on the basis of the Auditor-General’s reports of financial improprieties at ministries and departments, sanctions have been imposed on the public officials responsible for the misuse of public money and steps taken to retrieve the monies.
The political opposition has always argued that since chief executives of the assemblies are appointed by the President and play key political roles in his administration, the Executive is often reluctant to sanction them for acts of financial impropriety.
With the war on corruption picking up greater steam, it is time to rein in the financial improprieties in the assemblies.
Website: www.sydneyabugri.com/Web