An Assistant Headmaster of the Kumasi Senior High School (
KUHIS), Mr George Amponsah Duodu, has gone to court over allegations that he sodomised a student of the school .
Joined to the application as respondents are the headmaster, Mr Baidoo and the Director-General of the Ghana Education Service (GES).
It is the contention of the assistant headmaster that the committee breached the rules of natural justice by not allowing him to cross-examine the student who accused him of sodomising him.
"The denial by the second respondent's [Mr Baidoo] investigative committee of my right to meet my accuser to cross-examine him on the allegation made against me prior to the conclusion of their investigative report amounts to
Ghana News Headlines
For latest news in Ghana, visit Graphic Online news headlines page Ghana news page
"The decision to deny me my right to fair hearing is deliberate since I had written to be allowed to cross-examine the said accuser in my statement before I appeared before the committee," he insisted.
Per court documents, Mr Baidoo set up a five-member member committee to investigate allegations of homosexual activities among some staff and students of
On November 5, 2018, Mr Duodu was invited to appear before the committee after allegations by a student that the assistant headmaster "introduced him into an act of homosexuality".
Mr Duodu denied the allegations both in writing and verbally when he appeared before the committee.
The committee preferred a charge of sexual misconduct against him and submitted its report to the Ashanti Regional Directorate of the GES.
In a letter dated November 20,
'Accuser can't be found'
According to Mr Duodu's application for certiorari, when he appeared before the Disciplinary Committee, the Headmaster testified and relied solely on the investigative report.
He avers that when his counsel questioned Mr Baidoo as to whether the investigative committee allowed him (Mr Duodu) to cross-examine the accuser, the Headmaster replied in the negative.
Also, he said, his counsel wrote to Mr Baidoo to produce the said accuser before the Disciplinary Committee for him to be cross-examined, but the Headmaster failed to do so.
"When the second respondent (Mr Baidoo) was questioned by the Disciplinary Committee why he failed to produce the said accuser before the Committee, his answer was that all attempts to reach the said person had proved futile," he added.
It is his case that the whole process is a "grand scheme being masterminded ostensibly to destroy my
Apart from his prayer for the court to quash the investigative report, Mr Duodu is also seeking an order from the court that would prohibit the respondents from continuing any disciplinary actions against him until the final determination of his application.