On Friday, September 4, 2026, the final group of 41 Ghanaians evacuated from South Africa arrived at the Accra International Airport.
Their arrival concluded an exercise that had brought home nearly 2,000 citizens following xenophobic attacks and growing hostility towards African migrants.
Three days later, veteran highlife musician Barosky returned from the United Kingdom.
Videos showing him homeless and distressed in Manchester had generated public concern.
Ghana's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, H.E. Sabah Zita Benson, travelled to meet him, assess his condition and help facilitate his return.
One intervention concerned nearly 2,000 people; the other concerned one.
Yet both invite the same question: What does a country owe its citizens when they become vulnerable beyond its borders?
A passport is visible evidence of citizenship.
A crisis reveals its deeper promise: mutual responsibility, protection, dignity and belonging.
From fear to action
The South Africa evacuation followed reports and images of African migrants being intimidated and attacked. In one widely reported incident, a Ghanaian in KwaZulu Natal was confronted, asked to prove his immigration status and told to leave and "fix his country".
Ghana initially responded through diplomacy.
The South African High Commissioner was summoned, and the Government demanded measures to protect Ghanaian nationals.
On May 12, President John Dramani Mahama approved the voluntary evacuation of an initial 300 people registered with Ghana's High Commission in Pretoria.
As more citizens sought assistance, the exercise was expanded.
The President also raised the matter with the Chairperson of the African Union Commission.
This was significant because xenophobia undermines Africa's aspirations for integration and solidarity.
A continent that stood together against apartheid cannot remain indifferent when Africans are attacked elsewhere in Africa because of their nationality.
Every sovereign state has the right to regulate migration.
Ghanaians abroad also have a responsibility to obey the laws of their host countries.
But immigration enforcement belongs to lawful institutions, not individuals who intimidate, assault or dispossess migrants.
Behind journey home
On the ground, Ghana's High Commission in Pretoria became the bridge between policy and rescue.
Led by Benjamin Kofi Quashie, the Mission registered and screened distressed citizens, engaged South Africa's Department of Home Affairs, assisted with emergency documents and coordinated transportation from different provinces.
It also worked with Ghanaian community and religious organisations to shelter those awaiting evacuation.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs coordinated the wider operation.
Foreign Affairs Minister Hon. Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa demanded investigations into the deaths of Ghanaians and indicated that losses suffered by affected citizens were being documented for possible legal action.
Evacuation provides immediate safety.
Justice requires accountability for the violence that made evacuation necessary.
Returnees also received medical, psychological and reintegration support.
The exercise brought together state institutions, the International Organisation for Migration, religious bodies and private organisations.
The Church of Pentecost in South Africa provided shelter, while Engineers & Planners contributed GH¢16 million towards an operation that cost approximately GH¢49.72 million.
This was not the achievement of one person or institution. It showed what becomes possible when political authority, professional diplomacy, public institutions and communities act around a shared human responsibility.
Foreign policy made human
Foreign policy is often discussed through treaties, embassies, official visits and international conferences. To a citizen in crisis, however, it is deeply personal.
It is the distress call answered by an embassy, the diplomat who negotiates safe passage and the emergency document that makes a journey home possible.
Sometimes it is a mass evacuation from South Africa.
At other times, it is a High Commissioner travelling to Manchester because one Ghanaian has been found homeless and vulnerable.
The size of a crisis may determine the scale of the response, but it should not determine the value of the citizen.
Since 2025, Ghana's diplomatic missions and international partners have reportedly assisted in repatriating another 4,972 distressed citizens from countries including Libya, Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria, Cambodia and Algeria.
Some were stranded migrants. Others were victims of trafficking, fraudulent recruitment or forced participation in online scams.
Ghana has also engaged Ukrainian authorities over two nationals being held as prisoners of war after reportedly being recruited to fight for Russia, while raising concerns with Russia over the recruitment of Ghanaians into the conflict.
These interventions form part of a longer national tradition of assisting citizens during conflicts, public health emergencies and other crises.
Their present importance lies in the opportunity they provide to build a permanent system of consular protection.
Building national system
The South Africa evacuation was unforeseen and had not been included in the Ministry's budget.
The experience led Hon. Ablakwa to announce plans for a Ghanaian Diaspora Consular Fund.
The proposed fund is intended to provide dedicated emergency financing for evacuations, repatriations and other consular interventions.
The idea is timely, but questions about its funding, eligibility rules, governance and accountability must be answered.
Its value will lie not in its announcement, but in whether it becomes a transparent and sustainable system that endures beyond any government.
Protection must also begin before rescue becomes necessary.
Ghana needs stronger regulation of overseas recruitment agencies, education on safe migration and accessible systems for verifying foreign employment opportunities.
Citizens abroad should register with the nearest Ghanaian mission, regularise their status and respect the laws of their host countries.
A country cannot prevent every difficulty its citizens may encounter abroad.
Neither can diplomatic protection erase the consequences of every personal decision.
But a responsible state must remain present, responsive and prepared. It must ensure that vulnerability does not become abandonment.
A Ghanaian passport must represent more than permission to cross borders.
It should carry the assurance that, wherever citizens may be, the Republic recognises a continuing responsibility towards their dignity and welfare.
A nation is not only the place from which its people come.
At its best, it is also the place that remembers and, when circumstances demand, comes for its own.
The writer is a Public Relations Officer at the Ministry of Local Government, Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs/staff, Information Services Department (ISD).
E-mail:
